Question 1 · Reproductive Freedom Amendment
It reads like women’s health care. Here’s the rest.
Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to (i) protect the freedom to make personal decisions about prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, birth control, abortion, miscarriage management, and fertility care; (ii) protect doctors, nurses, and patients from being punished for these decisions; and (iii) allow for restrictions on access to abortion during the third trimester of pregnancy except when the patient’s health is at risk or the pregnancy cannot survive?
The Department of Elections says the amendment creates a fundamental right to carry out abortion care, and that the Commonwealth may only regulate in the third trimester — and even then cannot prohibit an abortion a physician judges needed for the pregnant person’s physical or mental health, or if the fetus is not viable.
That is a constitutional lock, not a status-quo reminder. “Mental health” is not a bright line. Parental involvement for minors can get treated as a burden on a new fundamental right. Licensing rules can too.
A no vote does not ban abortion in Virginia. It leaves the current code in place instead of writing the broadest version into the document that is hardest to change. After the pictures, a lot of people who still call themselves pro-choice still pause here.
Official text: elections.virginia.gov — Question 1